Canal Commission, subdivision developers continue negotiations


Published/Last Modified on Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:22 AM EST

Lance Martin Herald Senior Staff Writer
Advertisement
ROANOKE RAPIDS - The Roanoke Canal Commission and developers of Rivers Edge subdivision continue to go over proposals to see if they can reach an agreement on what impact the new subdivision will have on the Canal and the land surrounding it.

After meeting in closed session on the matter Wednesday night, no agreement was reached.

Canal Commission Chairman Mike Greene explained before the meeting, “We're going to go over the proposal. It might need some fine-tuning. When we sign everything we'll have to have another meeting.”

Members of the commission have walked the canal trail where the Rivers Edge subdivision is proposed to be built, Greene said. “I think we're coming a little closer.”

Rivers Edge developer Thomas Barrett had no comment.

At issue are two proposals, one formed by the commission and the other a counter-proposal created by the developers.

The commission has voted to grant Barrett and Mike Davis what it calls an appropriate easement to cross the canal property for storm drainage and sewage connection along with a single pedestrian access bridge to the canal.

That easement is granted on the following conditions:

Prior to any work to cross the canal property, the commission is given a 50-foot strip of land adjacent to the canal property on the south side of the canal spanning the entire length of the property.

Give the Roanoke Canal Museum and Trail a parcel of land between the canal and the Roanoke River.

Guarantee the commission the sole right for final approval of all plans and/or grants of rights-of-way.

The developers have come up with a counter-proposal stating they would agree to a 50-foot strip adjacent to the commission property on Old Farm Road to be left natural and a nature easement placed on the recorded final subdivision plat.

The developers also agree to donate $25,000 over the next two years to the commission for upgrades to the trail. The commission would also be allowed to keep using the current path across the developers' property for trail maintenance.

The developers, in turn, want the commission to grant them a 30-foot easement across its property to place sanitary sewer and storm water lines. The lines would be placed underground and all commission property would be returned to its original grade and landscaped according to the commission's specifications.

The developers also want the commission to grant them a 10-foot easement for the construction of an access walkway to the trail and river across the commission's property. This walkway would be constructed per specifications stated by the commission.

The planning board last week tabled the matter until its Feb. 15 meeting to allow for further study.

The 126-lot subdivision is located in an area beginning at the intersection of Virginia Avenue and running down Old Farm Road to Rollingwood Road. The subdivision will contain single family houses ranging in size from 1,800 to 2,500 sq. ft. and, with the price of lots included, costing between $250,000 to $500,000.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Daily Herald is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in rrdailyherald.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Daily Herald. The Daily Herald does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Daily Herald spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   
 

Contact Us

Contact Us
(252) 537-2505