Puppy mill bill gaining momentum

by Hank Dewald, Daily Herald Staff Writer
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:05 PM EDT

ROANOKE RAPIDS — A bill to regulate commercial dog breeding operations currently being considered in the General Assembly is generating some excitement among local animal shelters and concerned citizens, many of whom think it is long overdue.
Advertisement
Sometimes referred to as the Puppy Mill Bill, the legislation defines commercial breeding operations and provides specific guidelines for the operation of such a facility, a licensing requirement, an inspection process to ensure compliance, as well as penalties for failing to comply.

The bill, HB 733 in the House of Representatives and SB 460 in the senate, is sponsored by two area lawmakers, Rep. Lucy T. Allen and Sen. Ed Jones. At this time, the two other local representatives of the valley area, Michael Wray, in District 27  and Angela Bryant, in District 7, are not listed as co-sponsors of the bill and could not be reached to ask if they plan to support the bill.

Mike Markarian, executive president of The Humane Society of the United States, has written a letter to many N.C. animal shelters asking them to encourage their supporters to contact their representatives about supporting and voting for the bill.

“Puppy mills are breeding facilities that mass-produce puppies for sale in pet stores, over the Internet and directly to the public,” Markarian said in the letter. “Dogs at puppy mills are often stacked in filthy wire cages, often with little or no veterinary care or human interaction, and treated not like pets but like a cash crop. Mother dogs are constantly bred and kept in continual confinement. They are destroyed or discarded when they can no longer churn out puppies.”

Markarian said law enforcement raids of breeding operations have uncovered hundreds of dogs living in deplorable conditions, proving that puppy mills are a serious problem in North Carolina.

Allen has said she is passionate about getting this bill passed but wanted small, home breeders and hunters who breed sporting dogs to know the bill is not targeting them. Section Two of the bill clearly defines commercial breeding operations as “any person who, during any 12-month period, maintains 15 or more adult female dogs for the primary purpose of the sale of their offspring as companion animals.”

The definition goes further and states, the bill “shall not include those kennels or establishments operated primarily for the purpose of boarding or training hunting, sporting, herding or guide dogs.”

Donna May, one of the founders of Down East Animal Refuge (DEAR), a “no-kill” animal shelter in Scotland Neck, said she was thrilled by this new bill and is also urging everyone to support it. The DEAR shelter is full and cannot take in any more animals, so she is also passionate about slowing the number of unwanted or abused dogs in North Carolina.

“This is a great first-step in regulating the breeding of dogs in North Carolina,” May said, “But it (the laws regulating dog breeding) should eventually be more like our neighbor to the north, Virginia.” May said a large portion of the people who contact DEAR about adopting dogs are from Virginia because the stringent laws there have reduced the number of unwanted dogs in that state. She would like to see that happen in North Carolina soon.

“One female dog can have six to eight puppies in one litter and eventually generate 600 or more dogs in her lifetime, so something must be done to reduce the number of unwanted dogs and cats in North Carolina,” May said.

Local PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) representative Emily Allen said she didn’t know the details of the proposed legislation in N.C. but would support any regulation of commercial breeding operations in the state. The Norfolk PETA affiliate she works with operates an animal clinic in Emporia, Va. and transports dogs from the Roanoke Rapids area there for free or reduced cost spay and neutering, as well as basic veterinary care.

May also pointed out the numbers of unwanted animals has increased as the economy has taken a downturn. “The cost of pet foods has risen, sometimes dramatically and that is becoming a big problem, not just for pet owners, but for us as well. Many people find they can no longer feed their animals and begin looking for help in finding them a new home. We really need to do something to slow the numbers down and this is a good first step.”

Comments

    lina wrote on Jun 8, 2009 1:30 PM:

    " People breed dogs to pay their bills.
    totally lack of humanity,interest in animals NONE.Yeah,nice "kennels to breed them" and them and get the money! after all that 's what YOU want the CASH
    anyone that breeds for sale doesn't have a concience,taking advantage of a creature,disgusting!!!! GET a REAL job,and leave dogs alone!!!! "

    Recel wrote on Apr 22, 2009 6:25 PM:

    " My mom owns a kennel up North, and the SPCA has mentioned (on many occasions) how pleased they are with her facilities, and that they are MUCH better than their own. There is a HUGE difference between kennels and puppy mills. If we can get TRUE puppy mills to shut down without hurting the kennel owners who actually CARE about their animals and treat them well, then I will support it, but not if the bill is going to shut everyone down and keep all breeders from doing business. That's rediculous! And don't get me started on PETA. Those fools need to be chopped up in dog food. "

    Emma Rae wrote on Apr 21, 2009 12:31 PM:

    " Obviously, NONE of you who are writing against this legislation or the efforts of Rescues and animal rights organizations against puppy mills,have experienced a face to face encounter with the horrendous conditions of what is now considered a realistic nightmare for these poor, defenseless, and abused dogs and puppies. Some may be very quick to jump to assumptions that this will only affect and ruin the routine and practice of humane breeders, however, if you've ever seen an inhumane puppy mill in action, I am somewhat convinced you would not be so quick to judge the committed and what will be the continual pursuance of people that are speaking and acting on behalf of these tormented dogs and puppies. I agree...do the research, and when you do, majority of it will be facts, investigations, pictures, articles, lawsuits, etc. on the REALITY of how cruel and inhumane puppy mills really are...better yet, as far as doing your research, go to an actual puppy mill or volunteer to help with a raid on an inhumane puppy mill, see the conditions, look those puppies in the eyes (while they are crammed into a little cage of at least 5 or more), see the mother dogs who constantly breed and are worn out from top to bottom, see the dogs and puppies reactions whenever they go outside for what seems like the first time they have ever felt the sun on their faces...then AND ONLY THEN...can you say you have truly done your research. Everyone has their own passions in life I suppose. But unless you actually know what's going on out there (as far as puppy mills), and how horrific the sight of this daily torment is for those helpless and defenseless dogs and puppies, then yes, you can state your opinion on the matter, but don't expect to be believable and justifiable; OR that your convinced that these efforts of those of us who truly care, to try and get a more humane legislation passed towards puppy mills, should be more concerned about the poor "good breeders" who might be affected. If they are truly doing it the right way, then they have nothing to worry about. This is legislation towards extreme puppy mills. Not show breeders or military or whatever. There are very specific characteristics as to how one classifies an inhumane puppy mill. THESE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE GETTING TARGETED. Don't object to a cause that is trying to HELP save lives and improve humane actions towards dogs and puppies who can't help themselves!...oh I forgot...it's because there is the POSSIBILITY that ALL dog breeding facilities/homes may be closely examined as to how humane their practices are...That's just so unfair!!! GIVE ME A BREAK! "

    Doug wrote on Apr 1, 2009 9:47 AM:

    " I am also against using economic conditions as an excuse to allow cruelties. This is not exactly the Great Depression, and it would not matter if it was.

    Your legislators have time to handle both issues. If they cannot handle both issues at the same time, then you have some really bad legislators. "

    Doug wrote on Apr 1, 2009 9:41 AM:

    " I am for any law that helps animals.

    If someone's rights to abuse others are limited, so be it. "

    harvey mccormick wrote on Mar 27, 2009 6:36 PM:

    " i own 74 pitbulls and they are well taken care of and fed every day. i feed the best table scraps and purina. i have sold these since 1973 and have 43 females however i am a licensed breeder. i am not a puppy mill. visit me in weldon. "

    Susan wrote on Mar 27, 2009 12:38 PM:

    " What may seem vague, general and harmless now is the beginning of the HSUS plan to cripple the ability to breed dogs in any amount for any reason. We already have state animal cruelty statutes and local ordinances to protect dogs from abuse. The only people who will be impacted from this legislation are the breeders out in the open already doing a fine job. Those who are irresponsible will go underground and evade regulation.

    The bills also state quite plainly that breeding is not allowed without a certificate from a veterinarian. This is outrageous. No other domestic species has regulations in place for standards and/or limitations for breeding.

    The HSUS agenda is not about animal welfare it is about control. Responsible breeders, hunters, trainers, owners do not need to be sacrificed to unreasonable laws because there are a few bad apples in the barrel. "

    Tam Cordingley wrote on Mar 27, 2009 9:41 AM:

    " The ramifications of this bill go way beyond the overpopulation issue. They impact all purebred breeding, which is NOT, and the emphasis is not an error, puppy milling. Puppy Milling has become a term used for anyone who breeds dogs. There is no real definition. There are already laws on the books about animal welfare, if they are used as written rather than allowing the Animal Rights zealots to write our laws, the animal situation will improve.

    The breeders that will be impacted by this law are the show people, the police and military dog breeders, the obedience and competition people, and the people who take the best possible care of their dogs. The true puppy millers will fly under the radar.

    Many people are not aware that if this law passes the numbers will be reduced and the fees will be increased. They are also not aware that it calls for warrantless search and seizure. In addition the quarters for the dogs will have to be concrete and steel, no warm beds, no sleeping on the sofa. The "breeding dogs" will be prohibited from being in the house. These laws are mandated by the USDA, whose standards these laws generally follow.

    The Animal Rights people, PETA and HSUS, are pushing to introduce this type of bill in 34 states this year. NC has been chosen to be one of them. Please look deeper into these bills that the eliminating puppy mills and see the truth behind such legislation. It is just one more tool to eliminate animal use and ownership. "

    Ep Ratledge wrote on Mar 27, 2009 8:25 AM:

    " I can't believe you would consulte a member of PETA on this subject. Do you not remember the mass killing of dogs PETA illegally did in Ahoskie just a couple of years ago?

    The fact that puppy mills are being busted, shows a system in place that is working. Animal neglect, and cruelty are against the law in NC. We do not need more laws, we simply need to enforec those on the books. And we certainly don't need to hear from the likes of PETA! "

    Jerry Dobbins wrote on Mar 27, 2009 8:13 AM:

    " This bill is much the same as one that was passed a dozen years ago in IL with similar limits. But in typical Animal Rights fashion, the numbers have been reduced to commercially licensing anyone with 5 or more breeding animals. HSUS is now trying to reduce the IL numbers further to 3 or more. The radical Animal Rights extremists apply a strategy of "Incremental Legislation." They push for their inch, but then they take a mile. In Amanda Arrington's, (NC HSUS Director) own words, "The key to legislation is compromise and sometimes incremental change."

    This legislation is unconsititional, and additionally, it is irresponsible of our legisltors to even consider this garbage during the current economic climate. There are 100's of thousands of Farmers, Hunters, Breeders, and Pet Owners who are watching closely to see how this goes. The sponsors of this Bill and any legislator who votes in favor of it, can expect to join the ranks of the 10+% Unemployed in NC after the next election. "

    Tristan wrote on Mar 26, 2009 9:42 PM:

    " Rep. Allen should be more concerned about our rising unemployment rate, families losing income, children with no insurance than holding hands with HSUS to help persecute dog breeders. "

    Natalie wrote on Mar 26, 2009 9:39 PM:

    " The "puppy mill bill" has nothing to do
    with actually solving the problem of too
    many dogs and not enough homes...if, as animal rights groups claim, 25% of the dogs in shelters are purebred, then the rest are accidental breedings...why would anyone support a law that "might" eliminate one fourth of a problem?? Why do all breeders of purebred dogs take the brunt of every legislative attack??
    There are no standards written for home breeding/raising of dogs-this bill will force breeders to erect building and raise animals in sterile conditions without the feel of sunlight or grass or dirt....GREAT....and the expense will be passed along to the consumer...

    WHY would a reporter listen to anyone associated with PETA...they have a shelter in Norfolk, and with a 2008 budget of $32 MILLION dollars, they took in 2,124 animals and found homes for 7 of them..SEVEN!!!! They know nothing about animals that needs to be shared with anybody-

    Education and the availability of low cost spay neuter are working--it's obvious to anyone that bothers to do the homework instead of depending on PETA and H$U$ to tell them what they believe--BUT..if there are no breeders, then everyone can get shelter dogs..and the animal rights groups will claim huge victories in the name of the animals...
    The writing is on the wall--get off the animal rights bandwagon, do your own research, and DO NOT take anything at face value--half a truth is really no truth at all.... "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Daily Herald is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in rrdailyherald.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Daily Herald. The Daily Herald does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Daily Herald spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   
 
 

Contact Us

Contact Us
(252) 537-2505