City salary study: Police are underpaid
Council concerned other city workers have same problem

by Roger Bell
The Daily Herald Staff Writer
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 2:47 PM EST

ROANOKE RAPIDS — City Council received the results of a police department salary study conducted by City Manager Paul Sabiston’s office Monday evening at its monthly work session. The study was  requested by Councilman Jon Baker.

Roger Bell | The Daily Herald Roanoke Rapids Police Chief Jeff Hinton looks on as the Roanoke Rapids City Council conducts their work session Monday evening.



Advertisement
The city considered data from communities comparable to Roanoke Rapids in population in addition to the neighboring jurisdictions of Halifax and Northampton counties. The study found Roanoke Rapids trailed the cities in average salary for police officers, in addition to starting salary for police officers with exceptions for Enfield, Warrenton and Weldon in starting salary and Weldon and Enfield for average pay.

Average pay for a police officer in Zebulon had the highest difference from Roanoke Rapids — officers in Zebulon average $43,712 yearly while Roanoke Rapids officers average $28,370.

Other comparisons included in the study were master officer salaries, investigators (detectives), sergeants, lieutenants, captains and chiefs. Roanoke Rapids trailed all other jurisdictions listed in the study, with a discrepancy of nearly $27,000 in the average salary for Roanoke Rapids police chief and the Eden police chief. Baker expressed dismay at the study’s results.

“We have a problem which exists in the police department,” Baker said. “That’s why I asked for the pay study.”

Baker then advocated Council fix the problem, saying they had money available. “It’s time to make things right,” Baker stated. “The money is available to fix the police department.”

Councilman Ernest Bobbitt, a former police chief for the city, expressed like-mindedness with Baker. “I agree wholeheartedly with Jon,” Bobbitt said. “The sad thing about it is other (city) departments are just as bad. We do need to do this.”

Baker urged Council to take $248,000 — money Finance Director MeLinda Hite says is available to the city this fiscal year — and “fix the problem in the police department.”

Mayor Pro-Tem Carl Ferebee agreed, but stated any pay adjustments for the police must be permanent. “If we do that we want to continue to do that,” he said.

Councilman Ed Deese urged caution moving forward. “I think we would concur all employees deserve a salary increase,” Deese said. “I think we have to be very careful about this. We want to do the right thing by everybody.”

Baker added he wished to do salary adjustments for all city employees, but urged the council to move forward with police pay adjustments as soon as possible and study other departments later. “You have to start somewhere,” Baker said. “Let’s figure out the plan and stick to the plan. The money is there, it’s available. We have the capability to fix the problem and not talk about it.”

In the end, Council did not take action. Deese recommended third party advice and many seemed to advocate salary adjustments for all city employees, rather than just police officers.

Comments

    concerned citizen wrote on Nov 5, 2009 1:45 PM:

    " These "other" city employees, do they wear bullet proof vest to work everyday and put their lives on the line? I think you know where the money needs to go. "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Daily Herald is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in rrdailyherald.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Daily Herald. The Daily Herald does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Daily Herald spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   
 

Contact Us

Contact Us
(252) 537-2505