The theater core issue for many voters

by Roger Bell
The Daily Herald Staff Writer
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 5:05 PM EST

ROANOKE RAPIDS — Voters casting ballots in the Roanoke Rapids municipal elections Tuesday arrived at their decisions based on a variety of issues. Of course, The Roanoke Rapids Theatre figured prominently for some, but many had other concerns as well.
Advertisement
One voter stated she was casting her votes based on The Roanoke Rapids Theatre issue, but also based on candidate profiles she’d read “in the paper.” She was a longtime resident of the city in her 40s. Another voter from that same age group said he cast his ballot based on “a clean sweep,” meaning he wished to see incumbents ousted from their positions.

However, incumbent backlash and the theater project did not figure in the minds of all voters. Two high school students voting in their first election stated they were voting to change “the way things are done in the schools.” Still another a longtime resident, in his 50s, said he was voting for “who can make a payroll.”

One woman, 82, came to the polls to vote for a specific candidate; she had no issues on her mind other than to cast her ballot for her choice. Another woman who’d lived in Roanoke Rapids for 33 years said she was voting for the “candidates I know.”

A male in his 30s who moved to Roanoke Rapids in February of this year said he was looking for candidates who “have the interests of small business and community development” in mind. One woman in her 60s, another longtime resident, said she was choosing her candidates based on “honesty.”

Other voters simply said they had no specific issues in mind when casting their ballots. But the Roanoke Rapids Theatre loomed large for many.

One 29-year-old male who has lived in Roanoke Rapids since he was 2-years old voted based on “The Roanoke Rapids Theatre and the financial impact it will have on us for the next 10 years.” A woman in her 60s who grew up in Roanoke Rapids, moved away then returned in 1983 said they should have built up the area around Carolina Crossroads before building the theater. “Nobody bases their vacation around seeing a show,” she said. “They put the cart before the horse” on the theater project.

Given the results of Tuesday’s elections, it’s clear the voters were not happy with the way Roanoke Rapids has been run. The new mayor and the new council members say they are ready to begin the task of restoring the citizens’ confidence in city leadership.

Comments

    Ken wrote on Nov 20, 2009 9:28 PM:

    " >“The Roanoke Rapids Theatre and the >financial impact it will have on us >for the next 10 years.”

    I thought the theatre had been sold. How can it have a negitive impact?

    >“Nobody bases their vacation around >seeing a show,

    Ever heard of Branson? Besides, if the new owners want to, they can play 300 shows a year, drawing 100,000 plus! "

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Daily Herald is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in rrdailyherald.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Daily Herald. The Daily Herald does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Daily Herald spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
   
 

Contact Us

Contact Us
(252) 537-2505